Close Window



 
 
 
NEWS
Court: South Carolina Town Council's Prayers Unconstitutional

Adelle M. Banks
07-28-04

(RNS) Two groups concerned about church-state separation have welcomed an appeals court ruling that a South Carolina town council violated the Constitution by opening meetings with Christian prayers.

The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Thursday that the practice of the Great Falls, S.C., town council of saying prayers specifically related to the Christian faith violated the First Amendment's Establishment Clause.

 

"Public officials' brief invocations of the Almighty before engaging in public business have always ... been part of our nation's history," wrote Judge Diana Gribbon Motz. "This opportunity does not, however, provide the town council, or any other legislative body, license to advance its own religious views in preference to all others, as the town council did here."

 

Darla Wynne, a follower of the Wiccan faith, filed suit against the council in 2001, saying the council's "Christian prayer ritual" was unconstitutional. A lower court agreed with her in a 2003 ruling and told the council to stop mentioning the name of Jesus Christ in its prayers.

 

Two organizations that filed amicus briefs on Wynne's behalf hailed the ruling.

 

"It is well-established that no government body can manifest a preference of one faith over another," said Paul S. Miller, president of the American Jewish Congress, in a statement. "This ruling affirms the most fundamental principles of the relationship of American governments to religion."

 

The Rev. Barry Lynn, executive director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, agreed, saying: "This ruling is a great victory for religious liberty and diversity. ... In America all faiths are equal in the eyes of the law."

Close Window



Copyright © 2002-2004 EthicsDaily.com
EthicsDaily.com is an imprint of  the Baptist Center for Ethics